Bottom Line - States with the most lax … anti-corruption laws
By Michael B. Sauter, Charles B. Stockdale, 24/7 Wall St.
http://bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/27/10812551-states-with-the-most-lax-anti-corruption-laws
The Center for Public Integrity released a report
detailing the risk of corruption and lack of accountability in all 50 states
last week. The findings of the report should worry anyone who believes state
governments are transparent and free of corruption. Of course, no state is
without flaws. Unfortunately, nearly every state received a grade that would
give residents cause for concern.
The Center for Public Integrity’s report examined issues
concerning accountability and ethics in each state government. States were
graded on 330 separate metrics, which were grouped into 14 major categories.
Overall grades are based on the average grades in the major categories, which
included lobbying disclosure, political financing, internal auditing, ethics
enforcement agencies and redistricting.
Most states scored poorly. No state earned an A, and only
five states received better than a B+. More than half the states received a D+
or worse. Scored from 1 to 100, eight states earned failing grades of 59 or
below from the project.
24/7 Wall St.:
America's least corrupt states
24/7 Wall St. examined the eight states that received an F and the five states that
scored B- or better. A review of the states with the highest and lowest scores
illustrates that regular monitoring of the government by citizens, public
employees and watchdog groups is essential to encourage state integrity.
According to Randy Barrett, Communications Director for
the Center for Public Integrity, one of the most widespread issues throughout
these state governments is the lack of public access to information, which, he
says, is key to preventing other kinds of corruption and conflicts of interest
from occurring. “When you think about it, that’s really the
root of transparency. If citizens can’t see into how their state does
business and decision-making, that’s the real problem,” Barrett said.
States with the worst corruption risk scores lack
powerful watchdog agencies. In many states, according to Barrett, the existing
groups intended to ensure ethical action by elected officials lack real power.
Virginia, which scores among the worst in terms of corruption risk, does not
have a statewide ethics commission at all. Barrett suggests that the reason
many states have such ineffectual watchdog organizations is that the elected
officials they are supposed to be monitoring consistently vote in favor of
cutting their funding and restricting their power.
Surprisingly, most of the states that received high
marks have big governments with long histories of corruption and political
machinery. Connecticut and California fit this description. New Jersey,
where it seems former and current officials are indicted every year on ethics
charges, received the highest grade in the country. Despite its colorful political
past and present, New Jersey received a
perfect score in areas such as lobbying disclosure and internal auditing.
According to the report, the reason states with historical problems with
corruption now have high accountability scores is precisely because of their
former offenses. Those past problems led to strict enforcement measures that
have kept politicians honest and information readily available.
Many of the states with the worst corruption scores have
not had the same public issues with corruption that trigger reform. These
states, according to the report, are among the most sparsely populated in the
country. Reporters sent to conduct research for the State Integrity
Investigation found these smaller populations lead to a relaxed, “everybody-knows-everybody”
attitude. This environment leads to a lack of reporting by elected officials, a
look-the-other-way approach regarding campaign finance and lobbying, and an underfunding (or nonexistence) of political oversight
groups.
24/7 Wall St.: America's Most Miserable States
According to Barrett, states with stagnant political
environments often encourage corruption. Governments with high levels of
corruption tend to have a political party -- either the Democrats or
Republicans -- in power for a long time. The states that have had a “machine”
in place for a long time often tend to be the most corrupt. Machines tend to
want to protect themselves.
These are America’s
most corrupt states. Check it out at …… http://bottomline.msnbc.msn.com/_news/2012/03/27/10812551-states-with-the-most-lax-anti-corruption-laws